EATING FROM THE BUTTONS BOX
THE
BOOK
..........................-
TENDER
BUTTONS
THE
SUBBOOK ...................-
OBJECTS
THE
SUBPOEM
...................-
A TIME TO EAT: NUMBER 37
WORD
COUNT......................-
19
STANZA(S)............................-
1
THE
LEADER........................-
THE STEINY ROAD POET
GENRE..................................-
VIRTUAL OPERA
LOCATION............................-USA,
UK, Australia, Philippines, S. Africa, Canada.
TIME......................................-
ALL HOURS OF EARTH’S CLOCK
TONE.....................................-
POLITELY RAVENOUS BUT FINICKY
“My
initial take on this is a cross between Fiddler
on the Roof traditionalism and an episode of Downton Abbey.” Judy Meibach
“Each OBJECT has instructions,
is the instruction, the education,
of how to read it.
If so this OBJECT should eaten rather than read.” Allan
Keeton
A TIME TO EAT.
A pleasant
simple habitual and tyrannical and authorised and educated and resumed and
articulate separation. This is not tardy.
In presenting “A Time to Eat.” to the Buttons Collective, the Steiny Road Poet
suggested that despite the opening words pleasant
and simple, a patriarchal tyranny
seems to rule. Among the topics discussed were eating, rules for eating,
grammar rules, and details of Gertrude Stein’s family living, especially around
food. This poem also takes on a certain reflection from Ecclesiastes 3:2—To
Everything there is season, a time for every event under heaven…
EATING
AND SEPARATION
While
Dave Green walked the Buttons through the subpoem pointing out how each word
applied to the act of eating, Karren Alenier [a.k.a. Steiny] read through the
poem on the theme of separation.
Dave Green:
A TIME TO EAT.
pleasant ==> eating is
pleasant
simple ==> eating is a
simple affair most of the time
habitual ==>
we eat meals every day, they are daily habits
tyrannical ==>
eating is tyrannical in the sense that we are driven to do it by hunger, we
have no choice if we want to live
authorized ==>
society sets aside times for meals, recognizes that people need to eat
educated ==>
educated people know it is important to eat regular meals and to eat well
resumed ==>
a meal is a resumption of eating since the previous meal
articulate ==>
meals are occasions for conversation
separation ==>
eating is a separation from hunger
This is not tardy. ==>
We are eating at the right time. This is a time to eat.
Karren
Alenier:
Stein is describing separation in six ways.
A pleasant simple habitual separation ===> like
people who live together but one goes on a trip at regular intervals. I think
Leo occasionally traveled without Gertrude when they lived together before
Alice enter the picture.
tyrannical separation ===> one
person of a couple is put in jail, like Apollinaire when he was accused of
stealing the Mona Lisa.
authorised separation ===> one
person of a couple must report for military duty, like Apollinaire who was not
a French citizen signed up for the French military during WWI and after his
Mona Lisa incident.
educated separation ===> one
person of twosome is sent off to college, like when Michael sent Gertrude,
Bertha, & Leo east to Baltimore after their father died and then Leo went
north to Harvard.
resumed separation ===> one
person of a couple where they were not getting along leaves the relationship
yet again, something like the stormy relationship Marie Laurencin had with
Apollinaire.
articulate separation ===>
perhaps one can think of Gertrude's departure from Johns Hopkins as one she
thought through at length and over a period of time. It wasn't one thing that
helped her make up her mind. It was true that she was suffering from the bad
love affair with May Bookstaver where Gertrude felt not only spurned by made a
fool. May said she was experimenting with love and moved from a woman to a man
whom she married. Gertrude was also unhappy at Johns Hopkins where women were
treated patronizingly or disdainfully.
In this context, This is not tardy might mean these
kinds of separations were not slow and they were some how expected. In the wake
of these separations, one could only eat to mark time.
THE LINK BETWEEN SIX DEGREES OF SEPARATION
Peter Treanor remarked that Steiny’s separation read-through
made him think of six degrees of separation,
with full awareness that though separate, people are all increasingly
interconnected. Steiny responded that six degrees of separation is so
contrarian in that Steinian way of measuring the world.
Perhaps the impetus for this subpoem was Gertrude’s father
Daniel who force fed his children castor oil. Perhaps the castor oil regimen is
what gave Gertrude’s close-in-age brother Leo a bad stomach, if not
psychological problems.
THE AND-NESS OF THIS EATING
However, the meat of the discussion centered on grammar—grammar
rules and the way this subpoem is structured. Here are some highlights.
“I suppose the laws/rules of grammar (language) and the
laws/rules around eating/diet have various similarities. Both are concerned
with controlling or prescribing behaviour regarding a basic human activity.
Table manners and dietary laws and language use. Both are handed down through
generations, deeply steeped in tradition, both are central to a sense of
personal and cultural identity, both are taught not innate, there are great
sanctions involved in transgressing either, both are culturally specific. Both
are involved in articulation, chewing and speaking, and both result in us
behaving in a way contrary to the way we would naturally act.”
Peter also pointed out the over abundance of the conjunction and. It made him think of the eye
problem conjunctivitis. And now as Steiny ruminates about the overall
discussion, the abundant and’s sock
in the idea of six degrees of separation because the truth of this grammar is
how strongly Stein has connected these unparalleled adjectives. Here’s what
Eleanor Smagarinsky noticed.
STEIN’S WONKY ADJECTIVES
Eleanor Smagarinsky:
“According to this
site there are 5 categories of adjectives. And there are 5 and’s in this poem. English grammar
dictates the order in which different kinds of adjectives are placed in a
sentence, and whether they should be separated by a space, a comma or and (the site I'm using as a reference
describes these in detail).
“Stein's sentence construction feels off, because it is grammatically
weird, but not necessarily wrong. It's this grey area which makes
it so very unsettling....unpalatable. Separation
is the noun, which is described as being:
pleasant
simple
habitual
tyrannical
authorised
educated
resumed
articulate
“They all sort of make sense, but you really have to stop and
chew on the adjectives a bit, to get the taste for them. Can a separation be
habitual? Theoretically, perhaps. You can have an educated guess, so why not an
educated separation? I suppose. A resumed separation? Odd, but poetic, maybe.
Articulate separation? Really not sure about this one, but it does make you
think of the possibilities.
“And there is not one comma in the entire poem.
“Finally, WHAT is not
tardy? Grammatically, that's an incomplete sentence. What is this pointing to?”
SETTING THE TABLE ON TIME & GRAMMAR
Allan Keeton provides final words on this subpoem bringing
together eating, time, and grammar.
Allan
Keeton:
“Thinking more about eating AND about time AND grammar,
it seems that grammar organizes language
in a similar way that concepts of time organize experience.
They both set the table to allow us to eat (language AND
experience).
“A clock maintains time as
“habitual and tyrannical and
authorised and educated and resumed and articulate separation.
“Events become discrete. They happen one after the other to form
a narrative.
“Grammar maintains a similar authoritative separation between
words
AND even between events AND our experience.
“In this phrase:
A pleasant simple habitual and tyrannical and
authorised and educated and resumed and articulate
separation.
“things are strange because the joining conjunction AND which
wants to put every word on top of each other
“this AND that AND the other
“is actually spacing them out on the page to maintain
articulate separation.
The word AND is the
pleasant simple habitual and tyrannical and authorised and educated and resumed and articulate
separator.
in this sentence.
“There is some not quite convincing slight of grammar going on.
The phrase itself is tardy.
It takes time to get from habitual to articulate,
but the sentence says they all occur at once.”
NOT ALICE’S TABLE?
One stone left unturned is that Alice Toklas ruled the eating
once she entered Gertrude Stein’s life. She was the master chef. Those seated
at their table followed Alice’s rules of etiquette. Still, this subpoem seems
pervaded by a masculine tone especially with the march of words tyrannical and authorised and educated that seem
to point to Stein’s father Daniel.
No comments:
Post a Comment