What does one hope for in a book review?
The Steiny Road Poet has been mulling this over after
receiving
what she experienced as a
better
than average review published in
Mom
Egg Review July 22, 2021. In this review, Sara Epstein, who is a clinical
psychologist as well as a poet and songwriter, looks at ten poems from the 60
published in the collection
how we hold
on. She agilely addresses that none of the poems use punctuation:
“Alenier pulls us along with minimal or no punctuation. We
pause in the white spaces, line breaks, and other places where it makes sense
to pause. Otherwise, we race with the pace of the speaker’s life.”
What Steiny means about the reviewer’s agility is that the
reviewer understands that a line break doesn’t necessarily mean a full stop. Certainly
Steiny’s intention in dropping punctuation was to provide fluidity and to keep
the action moving.
Another aspect of how
we hold on which was satisfyingly appreciated by the reviewer was the
collection’s use of poetic form. Epstein commented that the format of the title
poem seemed to hold on to the message: “The structure itself is a kind of
holding in the way it contains her message in this rhythmic, evenly spaced form
(23).” Steiny particularly enjoyed the reviewer’s discussion of her Golden
Shovel poem: “‘What Was Hidden’ is yet another masterful example, using form to
show what hides in plain sight. A line from Claude McKay’s poem …is broken down
so that his words end each line of Alenier’s. Alenier evokes Anne Frank as she
looks back on race and white privilege in a scene from childhood.”
Sometimes it’s surprising to see what poems may garner mention.
What does that say about that poem? Is it standing out to the reviewer because
it doesn’t quite fit into the overall collection? The bottom line is that what any
poet whose book is being reviewed hopes for is accuracy. The beauty of online
reviews is that an author can request minor corrections if needed.